This Is Why the Trebuchet Was the Superior Siege Engine

Throughout the history of combined arms, artillery has played a key role in supporting the infantry. Commanders laying siege to fortified cities would call upon their engineers to identify weak points in defensive walls. Resources and manpower were then allocated to construct trebuchets, the medieval great-grandfathers of modern artillery.

There were two classes of trebuchets to choose from: the traction trebuchet and the more commonly known counterweight trebuchet. Both were made-to-order siege engines of battlefield superiority.

And they kicked copious amounts of ass.

The design for the traction trebuchet was born in Asia and spread throughout Europe and the Middle East. It saw service from 1,000 AD to 1,300 AD, mostly during the crusades, used to liberate cities in the Holy Land.

The trebuchet had a static frame, a dynamic beam on an axle, a sling to hold the payload, and ropes on the opposite side to pull down the beam to "fire." It was manned by a team of 20 to 140 troops, depending on its size.

Projectiles were between two and 130 pounds. The firing range changed from shot to shot, based on the strength of those pulling the ropes. This model was faster to build, transport and cheaper to make with a high rate of fire. Unfortunately, to use it, you had to pull exorbitant numbers of troops away from the battlefield.

The counterweight trebuchet was invented in the Mediterranean region in the late 12th century, and it was adopted in northern Europe and deep into Islamic-controlled areas. To this day, historians cannot reach a consensus on whether it was invented in Europe or the Middle East.

The new counterweight mechanism pulled the beam down to launch the projectile instead of relying on men to pull it down with ropes. The sling that held the payload was extended to improve range, and the beam was made thicker than its predecessor -- all because more power didn't necessarily mean more manpower.

Battles in the 14th century saw payloads as massive as 510-560 pounds, but something between 100-200 pounds was most common. These massive payloads could reach ranges of as far as 900 feet. Some sources say that trebuchets were also used to fling diseased corpses over city walls, an early form of chemical warfare.

The counterweight trebuchet could consistently deliver heavier munitions at longer distances than its predecessor. It was, however, a very complex machine to build properly, and specialists were few and far between.

Both the traction trebuchet and the counterweight trebuchet could be modified to include wheels, but the former could only be fired from a locked position due to its size. Regardless, once constructed and fortified, there were few disadvantages to the trebuchet.

Traction trebuchet were most often used to fire at buildings outside of city walls, while the counterweight trebuchet had the range and destructive capabilities to assault walls directly.

The trebuchet could provide whatever a given battle required. They were versatile machines, capable of different ranges, fire rates and power, depending on the situation. The trebuchet was such a successful piece of engineering that it solidified its place as the superior siege engine -- far more powerful and reliable than the inferior catapult.

More posts from We Are the Mighty:

Four exotic weapons that will make you rethink ancient warfare

Why even today artillery still has a key role in winning battles

7 real excuses troops use that no NCO ever believes

We Are The Mighty (WATM) celebrates service with stories that inspire. WATM is made in Hollywood by veterans. It's military life presented like never before. Check it out at We Are the Mighty.

Want to Learn More About Military Life?

Whether you're thinking of joining the military, looking for post-military careers or keeping up with military life and benefits, Military.com has you covered. Subscribe to Military.com to have military news, updates and resources delivered directly to your inbox.