A LAB -- FOR SECURITY POLICY?
U.S. security policy is at a standstill, argues the Federation of American Scientists' Steven Aftergood. The classification system is too bulky, the security clearance process too cumbersome. But bureaucrats block every effort to promote change, Aftergood says.
His solution: a security policy "laboratory" -- a safe zone in the national security bureaucracy in which new security policies could tested, scientifically. This enclosed environment wouldn't ruffle the feathers of the bureaucratic hens too badly. And with a limited scope, a failed experiment wouldn't become a national security disaster.
A LAB -- FOR SECURITY POLICY?
© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here.